Saturday, October 31, 2009

Are Brita and Pur Water Pitchers BPA-free?

My family has used a Brita pitcher for years to filter our water and make it safer to drink and I have always insisted our kids use it, rather than drink directly from the tap. Recently, though, I began to wonder if the pitcher itself might contain a dangerous chemical -- bisphenol A (BPA) -- that could leach into the water.

So, a couple of months ago, I used the contact form on Brita's website to ask. I didn't mention BPA directly. I simply asked what kind of plastic the different pitcher parts were made of.

Since Pur makes a similar pitcher, I decided to submit the same question to them. As Pur claims that its pitcher reduces pharmaceuticals from the water -- which would be wonderful if true -- I also asked what drugs the pitcher filters and how.

Following are the answers I received from each, and below that, an assessment.

Brita's Response

Dear Ms. Eisenberg,

Thank you for contacting us.

The pitcher lids and filter housings are made of Polypropylene plastic. The reservoirs and pitchers are made either from NAS (a Styrene based plastic) or SAN (Styrene Acrylonitrile). The soft-touch handles are made from an elastomer called Santoprene (not to be confused with Latex or Neoprene). Our products do not contain any bisphenol A and are all tested by the NSF (National Sanitation Foundation) for safety and wetted contact. Unfortunately the pitcher materials are not recyclable, and therefore do not have a plastic number. Please contact us at any time if you have additional questions.

Again, thank you for contacting us.

Sincerely,

Candy Thoma
Consumer Response Representative
Consumer Services


Pur's Response

Dear Ms. Eisenberg,
Hi Sheryl,

Thank you for contacting Pur.

There is no BPA present in any PUR pitchers/dispensers or lids. Pur pitcher/dispenser bodies are manufactured from an acrylic-based polymer classified as recycling code #7. Pur pitcher/dispenser lids are manufactured from polystyrene, code #6. Pur pitcher/dispenser filters are made from polypropylene, code #5, and also contain no BPA.

All Pur pitchers/dispensers undergo independent safety testing by NSF International, a not-for-profit certification agency for water treatment and other products. Our products meet all industry standards and specifications for material safety and chemical extraction. I’ll share your comments with the team.

Pur water filtration system is the first leading brand to claim reduction of pharmaceuticals identified in U.S. tap water. The new research shows that Pur Water Filtration Systems remove more than 99 percent of pharmaceutical compounds from America’s tap water using the Pur faucet filters and more than 96 percent with Pur pitchers.

Pur effectively reduces five different categories of medication including:

Hormones: prednisone, prednisolone, progesterone, testosterone and cortisol.

Antibiotics: ciprofloxacin, administered in tablet form to prevent certain infections caused by bacteria,as well as sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, which are administered intravenously to treat a wide variety of bacterial infections including pneumonia, and urinary tract and intestinal infections.

Antidepressants: fluoxetine, prescribed to treat a variety of conditions, including depression and other mental/mood disorders.

Anti-anxiety medication: meprobamate, a treatment used to relieve nervousness or tension that exceeds stress of everyday life.

Painkillers: ibuprofen and naproxen.

Thanks for writing.

Jim
Pur Team


My conclusions

Brita: Neither polypropylene nor the styrene compounds used in Brita pitchers contain BPA, so I feel comfortable that the company's BPA-free claim is true. Styrene is a worrisome chemical in its own right, but I feel reassured in this regard by the statement that the pitchers are tested by the NSF for safety and by NRDC's and EWG's comments on the subject. I am continuing to use our Brita pitcher at home.

Pur: As far as I know, acrylic does not contain BPA, so the Pur pitcher would also seem to be BPA-free. That said, I did not find the statement about Pur products meeting "industry standards and specifications for material safety and chemical extraction" at all reassuring. Industry standards are rarely stringent enough. (Sadly, even the standards of the FDA, which continues to allow BPA in food and beverage containers, are not high enough to protect people's health.)

On the question of how Pur's pitcher reduce pharmaceuticals -- there was no answer at all, only a vague assertion that "the new research shows" pharmaceuticals are reduced. My feeling is that Pur would have been more specific if it had convincing, independent research to back up its claim. I would therefore not put any stock in it.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

18 Comments:

Anonymous wendy said...

I was just washing out our Brita pitcher and had a sudden panic about this question. Was very happy and relieved to read your research. Thanks!

November 18, 2009 5:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for your thoughtful analysis.

December 4, 2009 7:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Terrific info. I have been using a brita filter/pitcher for years and have become very concerned. Thank you for the letter to the company effort, a bit of relief. Now, what to do about those organic cans of tomatoes, plastic orange juice containers, etc., etc.

December 10, 2009 12:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

styrene is not safe.

December 15, 2009 12:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for this research. I have recently read some articles about BPA and have become much more consious of what I'm using with my foods and water. I was glad to find your answers about BPA and the Brita. Thank you!

December 16, 2009 12:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank You for taking the time to initiate the questions about how safe are the Brita water pitchers. I just purchase one for my son to be used in his dorm room. it's comforting to know that the Brita Pitcher is still consider to be safe.

December 18, 2009 11:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi - Have you done any research on the large plastic Poland Spring dispensers? 5 gallon size, I think. I am 6 months pregnant and it has suddenly occured to me that I have no clue if I have been drinking BPA water this entire time... UGH!

January 11, 2010 3:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks! I too have been concerned about this for some time. My four year old son has had water from a brita pitcher from the time he was 1 (we had a faucet mounted brita filter for his first year). Every time BPA is in the news I fear that there might be contamination from the brita pitcher. This is reassuring!

January 17, 2010 11:00 AM  
Blogger Pam said...

Thank you for your research, and now for a really stupid question: Is it safe to leave a full pitcher on the counter (with the filter inserted) or should I move the filtered water to another container? Thanks for being there!

January 22, 2010 8:18 PM  
Blogger Sheryl said...

To the Poland Spring dispenser user -- I don't know the composition of those jugs, but if the number in the chasing arrows embossed on the bottom is a 7, it might contain BPA. In that case, the safe thing to do would be to dispense with the dispenser.

It is not clear in any case that bottled water is a safer alternative than tap water, since bottled water is not nearly as well regulated as tap (though if you know for a fact that there have been water quality problems in your municipality, that's another matter).

If tap water filtered in a Brita pitcher doesn't seem adequate to you, you might consider installing an under-the-counter water filter.

Once your baby is born, avoid clear plastic baby bottles and sippy cups as they are often made with BPA, as are food cans.

Here's some good advice from NRDC's Simple Steps site: http://www.simplesteps.org/chemicals/bisphenol-bpa

January 23, 2010 2:38 PM  
Blogger Sheryl said...

Pam, I don't know of any safety reason to move the water to another container.

January 23, 2010 2:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Safety and Health Topics
Styrene
Styrene is primarily a synthetic chemical that is used extensively in the manufacture of plastics, rubber, and resins. About 90,000 workers, including those who make boats, tubs, and showers, are potentially exposed to styrene. Health effects from exposure to styrene may involve the central nervous system and include complaints of headache, fatigue, dizziness, confusion, drowsiness, malaise, difficulty in concentrating, and a feeling of intoxication. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies styrene as a potential human carcinogen. It is also known as vinylbenzene, ethenylbenzene, cinnamene, or phenylethylene.


This came from osha

January 31, 2010 2:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree that, in the responses you've posted, Pur didn't explain how the pharmaceuticals were filtered out. As far as the answer for the plastics though, it seems as if their response was quite similar to Brita. Both were tested by the NSF so any "industry standards and specifications for material safety and chemical extraction" would most likely have been the same. The only differences seem to be that Pur phrased it that way, and that their plastics are recyclable and Brita's are not.

February 11, 2010 5:55 PM  
Anonymous Christine said...

It should be noted that Pur did not clarify if the plastic casing surrounding their "replacement filters" contained BPA.

They said "There is no BPA present in any PUR pitchers/dispensers or lids."

They conveniently left out "filters."

Did anyone else notice this?

February 12, 2010 7:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Christine reread the last line in the first paragraph.

"Pur pitcher/dispenser filters are made from polypropylene,code #5, and also contain no BPA."

February 12, 2010 7:54 PM  
Anonymous Michelle said...

Thank you. Very helpful informtaion.

February 15, 2010 8:56 AM  
Anonymous Kurt said...

I'm not sure what Pur needs to explain. The drugs are filtered out by the filter in the same way other chemicals are. The filtered water is tested to determine the extent of the reduction.

February 23, 2010 12:24 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It looks to me like both products are equal. I don't understand why you favor Brita over Pur because Pur didn't explain how it reduced pharmaceuticals, when Brita didn't mention it at all.

March 1, 2010 1:58 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home